Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Almost Wordless Wednesday - Is it just me?

small parts

I don’t get it… for the deal of the century ($12.99 plus shipping & handling), you can have a set of pajamas for your toddler that apparently has “small parts”.

Am I the only one that can’t find the “small parts”?

You know, the ones that are listed in those scary BOLD CAPS as:

small parts

And even more confusing, they are doing all they can to protect their customers… by only offering this dangerous item to kids 3+ years old who wear sizes 3 - 12 months.

small parts

Yeah, me neither…?

24 comments:

Melissa said...

Who knew?! :>)

Shana said...

That is crazy. I wold never spend 12.99 on pj's anyway but I don't get the small parts...lol.

HeatherOz said...

hmmmmmm! I DID search the photo for the small parts. Not seein' 'em!

Dyann said...

ummmm....

Pam said...

Well, the small parts aren't in the pj's yet! I just don't see why they are a choking hazzard.

Lauren said...

interesting...and weird!

Foursons said...

Yup, strange for sure! And why the heck do pj's have to be so darn expensive?

Kmama said...

LOL! I picked that out right away. I wonder if the fire truck wheels have buttons on them???

We got a TON of cute clothes for Buster when he was born and I was so surprised to see BUTTONS on a lot of them. Stuff made by carters, where buttons aren't necessary, but just a decoration sewn on.

Shana said...

I had to crack up at Pam's comment...lol

Michelle Pixie said...

???? Someone must have recieved a letter and got all ASCARED!

Leiah said...

I guess since only come in infant sizes the chance of, oh let's say a 3 yr old boy with goatlike tendencies who sleepchews through his jammies at night, could be a realistic one. Seriously? It's like the "don't dry your hair while in the tub with this hair dryer" label.

I'm in such a snarky mood today...I probably shouldn't be commenting on anyone's space.

{Kimber} said...

yeah...that is super weird!

He & Me + 3 said...

Gotta love how well they cover their bums. LOL

"Amandier" said...

Hmmm that's weird... Maybe it meant for the store tags?
I never buy my kids pajamas, I just let their grandparents buy them pajamas or let them go naked, whichever comes first. :-)

www.theladywolf.blogspot.com

Danielle said...

I am totally confused. If they didn't want people 3 and under to have the clothes, why the heck would they make those sizes? LOL. Hmmm.

robin said...

Too funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Margaret said...

That is crazy for sure!

Emily said...

LOL...I'm so cracking up at this!

Kelli @ RTSM said...

That warning has to be one of the weirdest things ever! That and the four year old who is small enough to wear those 3-6 months pj's!

Ruby Red Slippers said...

That is crazy...maybe just covering all their bases-someone, somewhere will find a "small part" and sue-

semicrunchymama said...

OK, so this picture had me scratching my head. Small parts...on PJs? Not for children under 3 years...who wear infant sizes? I was giggling a bit to myself, then scrolled down and read Leiah's comment and snorted OJ out of my nose.

Again, I read your blog while eating breakfast and have it cause self-inflicted bodily harm. You seriously need some sort of a warning label.

This just made my morning! =)

Shannon said...

Rachel!!!!!! You won the Isabella bracelet give away!!!!!!!
www.throwingourarmsopenwide.blogspot.com

K said...

OMG Rach you have me busting out laughing again

wife.mom.nurse said...

oh, give me a break!

(But I must say, I applaud your choice in the fire jammies)